2015 (6) TMI 1030

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Information Technology Software Service (ITSS) not liable to tax - Held that:- it was submitted that this claim has been rejected on the belief that the claim related to the period April, 2008, but the claim actually related to the period subsequent to 16-5-2008, by which time ITSS had become liable to service tax. Appellant not registered till June, 2008 - Held that:- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... IRC whereas the instructions are to the contrary. In my opinion, self-certification should be sufficient. Cenvat credit shown in the ST-3 returns does not tally with the amount claimed in the refund claims - Held that:- the refund claim is not based on ST-3 returns and ST-3 return is nothing but a report of transactions that have taken place over a period covered by the returns. On the ground that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 006 issued under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The first ground based on which refund has been rejected is that the Information Technology Software Service (ITSS) was not liable to tax. It was submitted that this claim has been rejected on the belief that the claim related to the period April, 2008, but the claim actually related to the period subsequent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on between export invoices and FIRC. Learned Commissioner (Appeals) has observed that the appellant has not furnished details of all the exports in respect of which the particular FIRC pertains. The amount shown in the FIRC is more than the export invoices in respect of which refund is claimed. Learned C.A. agrees that the appellant shall furnish the reconciliation statement showing all the export .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t documents on the basis of which credit was taken, nature of service and its nexus and utilization of the service for rendering output service are relevant and merely because there was some mistake in the ST-3 returns, substantive right of assessee for refund cannot be rejected. Therefore, I do not consider it necessary to consider the issue as to whether figures in ST-3 returns tallied with the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X