2016 (6) TMI 147

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... M application has been filed on 04.03.2016, after six months from the date of impugned order. The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CCE, Pune -III vs. GE Medical Systems [2009 (11) TMI 676 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] has examined exactly the same issue and has considered whether the CESTAT is correct in rejecting the ROM application filed beyond the period of six months, especially in view o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Liladhar T. Khusiliani seeking rectification of percieved mistakes in the Final Order No. A/11288-11289/2015 dated 18.08.2015 of this Tribunal. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The learned Authorised Representative for Revenue raises the preliminary objection that the subject ROM application cannot be entertained since the same has been filed after the prescribed time limit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder passed by it under sub-section (1) and shall make such amendments if the mistake is brought to its notice by the Commissioner of Central Excise or the party to the appeal. 6. It is observed that in the instant case, the impugned order is dated 18.08.2015 and hence the time limit for filing any ROM application expired on 17.02.2016. However, the ROM application has been filed on 04.03.20 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X