9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 187X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... against the assessment order Annexure B dated 12.2.2015 passed under S.39(2) of the Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 raising a demand of Rs. 1,88,89,718/-. 2. On the last occasion on 20.4.2016, learned counsel for the petitioner was granted time to take instructions with regard to the following two issues: I) Whether against the impugned order - annexure B dated 12.2.2015 the assessee would like to pre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nataka 2012(72) Kar.LJ 548 * Vars Builders, Bangalore Vs CTO (Audit 6), Bangalore 2015(82) Kar.LJ 564 * Amma Construction India Pvt Ltd Vs Asst. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit 5,9), Bangalore 2015(83) Kar.LJ 91 4. On the other hand, Mr T K Vedamurthy, learned Government Advocate has raised the objection of availability of an alternate remedy against the impugned order under S.62 of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India. An effective alternate remedy by way of an appeal is available to the petitioner assessee. Whether the input tax credit was rightly availed by the petitioner assessee or not and whether on the aforesaid items, the said credit is available to the petitioner or not, are mixed questions of fact and la ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
