TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 225X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 54029/2015 X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iscated, with the option to the importer to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine. Besides, penalties were imposed on the appellants by the adjudicating authority in terms of Section 112(a) of the Act. In appeal, the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed imposition of redemption fine and penalty, but reduced the quantum, excepting in the order dated 24.03.2014. Confirm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dings recorded in the impugned order and relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Arun Kumar vs CCE New Delhi (Final Order No. A/54657/2014-SMB dated 09.12.2014) to justify his stand that imposition of redemption fine and penalty are justified in the facts and in the circumstances of the case. 5. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for both the sides and perused the records. 6.  ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n Kumar (supra) has not considered the Division Bench order of Tribunal in Sandhya Jeweler. Since the decision of Tribunal in the case of Arun Kumar was by a single member bench and the decision of Division Bench has not been relied on therein, in my considered view, such decision is per incurium and cannot be relied on for deciding the issue in hand. 8. Therefore, following the judgm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|