9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 347X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated by the Regulation 20 (1) of the CBLR 2013, the period during which the suspension of the CB licence was operational and the time taken in forwarding the DRI's report to the New Delhi Commissionerate should be excluded for the purpose of computation of the period of limitation. Held that:- the Court is unable to agree with the above submission. As already held by this Court in several orde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ce then obviously the suspension cannot be maintained. Consequently, there is no legal infirmity in the impugned order of the CESTAT which calls for interference. - Decided against the revenue - CUSAA 18/2016 - - - Dated:- 31-5-2016 - S. MURALIDHAR VIBHU BAKHRU JJ For the Appellant: Mr. Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel. O R D E R CM No. 21899/2016 (for exemption) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... using various IECs at highly undervalued price. Acting on the above report of the DRI, the Commissioner of Customs (General) passed an order on 16th December 2013 suspending the Respondent's CB Licence, in exercise of the powers under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 ( CBLR 2013 ). The report of the DRI was forwarded to the New Delhi Customs Commissionerate on 4th November 2013 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cence was operational and the time taken in forwarding the DRI's report to the New Delhi Commissionerate should be excluded for the purpose of computation of the period of limitation. 6. The Court is unable to agree with the above submission. As already held by this Court in several orders including the recent order dated 24th May 2016 in W.P.(C) No. 1734 of 2016 [HLPL Global Logistics ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
