9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 710X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For the Respondent ORDER Ld. counsel says that germane of the case was from the Customs Appeal No.C/308/2010. In that case, stay order was passed on 7.2.2011 vide Stay Order No.204/2011, directing predeposit of Rs. 10 lakhs by the appellant Rajan Ran. 2. Ld. counsel explains that the allegation against the present appellant is that he was abettor in the commitment of the offe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on to restore the appeal as well as the stay application after condoning the delay. 6. Revenue says that when the appellant has come with so much of delay and also has defied the law there should not be leniency to be shown to the appellant. 7. Heard both sides and perused the record. 8. Record reveals that principal appeal No.C/308/2010 is on the records of the Tribunal. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h stay application for hearing. 10. Registry is directed to issue notice of hearing of stay application on 9.6.2016. 11. We make clear to the Revenue that when either of the cases come up, it should be mentioned in the cause list as to cases of hearing of each other so that it will not escape the notice of the Bench where huge revenue is in stake. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
