9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (9) TMI 652X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tax Act, 1961 ( Act ) is directed against the order dated 27-1-2006 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ( Tribunal ), Delhi Bench D , New Delhi in ITA No. 1440/Delhi/2003 for the assessment year 1997-98. By the impugned order, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee challenging the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The penalty was set aside by the Tribunal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g Bench was not considered in Ram Commercial Enterprises Ltd. s case (supra ) :- Whether satisfaction of the officer initiating the proceedings under section 271 of the Income-tax Act can be said to have been recorded even in cases where satisfaction is not recorded in specific terms but is otherwise discernible from order passed by the authority? She accordingly submits that this Court ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... amined to find out if the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer is discernible. Therefore, without expressing any view on the issue pending consideration by the Larger Bench, and presuming that the question referred to it is answered in the affirmative, we proceed to examine the assessment order in the instant case in order to find out whether the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer that penalty ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... am Commercial Enterprises Ltd. s case (supra). Further even on a detailed perusal of the assessment order no satisfaction of the Assessing Officer that penally proceedings are required to be initiated against the assessee is discernible. 8. Learned counsel for the revenue contends that speculation loss has been set off against business income, and therefore there was valid reason for the Assess ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
