2009 (11) TMI 940

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is delay of 33 days in preferring this appeal which is sought of condonation in Misc. W.No. 9574/2009 and a further application Misc. W. No. 9575/2009 for stay. 2. Appeal by the state under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, against only that part of the order dated 09.07.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.19066/2009, imposing a cost of ₹ 5,000/- on the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er in the writ petition id represented by Satyanarayan, Satyanarayan, learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee submits that the learned Single judge has very justifiable levied cost and the matter of this nature does not warrant interference in a writ appeal. 5. While wherein, even therefore an appeal of this nature is tenable under Section 4 of the Act, even otherwise, we find not much scop .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X