Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (6) TMI 942

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... TA No.349/Ahd/2001 dated 31/08/2004 for the assessment year 1989-90, whereby the appeal filed by the Department was allowed and appeal filed by the assessee-appellant herein was dismissed by observing in paragraph No.26 as under: 26. The reopening, though for escapement of interest from contracts not assessed ultimately, cannot be said to be bad in law because the assessee had not filed return at all. In the case of I.N. Dalmia, the assessee borrowed money for acquiring shares in company named Punalur Paper Mills Ltd., [hereinafter referred to as the PPM ] and had paid interest thereon. The assessee floated another company named Laxminiwas and Co. (Export) P. Ltd. [hereinafter referred to as the LNE ] and sold aforesaid shares of PPM .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 03 of the ITR 207, which is under: The last issue that arose in the case is whether the interest paid on the borrowed money for acquisition of the said shares could be added to its cost of acquisition for compensation of capital loss. On this issue, the appellate authorities answered it in the affirmative. The interest was paid allegedly on the moneys borrowed for the acquisition of the shareholding by the assessee. The interest was not claimed as capital investment and no claim was made for the capitalization of the same. The Assessing held that the assessee did not earn anything from the shares purchased out of the borrowed amount. As there was no income from the shares held by him, the interest could not be allowed. The appellate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it before this court that the said deduction should be allowed under the head Other sources though against the decision of the Tribunal that such interest was to be capitalized being part of cost of acquisition of shares has not been appealed against. It is well settled that an allowance for deduction can be upheld on a ground other than that on which it was allowed by the Tribunal. We, accordingly, hold that the interest in question in the present case cannot be part of the cost of production. It is allowable against the income from the investment in question and it can be considered to be set off against the income from other sources. In the circumstances, this issue is answered saying that the said sum on account of interest is allowab .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... under Section 147 of the Act, it is open for the Assessing Officer to assess or reassess any income which had escaped assessment which comes to his light during the course of his assessment proceedings which was not mentioned in the reason for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Act. In a notice for reassessment which has been issued beyond a period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year, the condition that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for the reason of the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose truly and fully all material facts for the purpose of assessment must also be established unless ofcourse some other ground viz. nonfiling of the return at all etc. is available to the Assessing Offic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (I) Ltd. has been followed by different High Courts. In case of CIT. vs. Jet Airways (I) Ltd.,the High Court, in its elaborate decision considering the statutory provisions, different judicial pronouncements and the explanatory memorandum for introduction of Explanation 3 to Section 147 of the Act, ruled in favour of the assessee. *** 33. In the result, we answer the question in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. All tax appeals are dismissed. 5. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the Department has submitted that the view taken by the ITAT is just and proper and there is no need to interference in the findings recorded by the Tribunal. 6. We have heard learned Counsel for the pa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates