Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (6) TMI 958

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ock and depreciation on such reduced block can only be allowed to the appellant, as also the cost of bonus shares are to be taken at rupees nil even if the said bonus shares are issued prior to the amendment of Section 55(2)(aa) of the Act Income Tax Act . 2. The facts of the case are that appellant was holding two units which was sought to be disposed of during the financial year 1996-97 at a price of Rs. 1.00 Crore and other unit at a price of Rs. 40 Lacs. The appellant got the bonus share prior to the amendment to Section 55(2)(aa) of the Act and when the original shares were sold prior to the assessment year under consideration, the average cost of the shares were taken into consideration and not the full cost while quantifying the cap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al and contended that the contentions of the appellant for the year 1997-98 was considered. 5.1 Mr.Soparkar, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant has also taken us to paragraph No.21 of the order of the Tribunal with regard to issue of cost of bonus shares allotted on 30th January, 1993 at Rs.Nil as per the amended provisions of Section 55(2)(aa) of the Act, instead of at their average cost while computing the long term capital gains and has relied upon the decision in case of Escorts Farms (Ramgarh) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Incometax 222 ITR 509 wherein judgment of the Constitutional Bench in case of CIT V. Gold Co. Ltd. [1970] 78 ITR 16 has been referred. He has therefore contended that the average share price ought to have been taken .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of assessee and against the department. 9. Now, so far as the finding of the AO rejecting the claim of the appellant on the ground that the cost of the bonus shares is to be taken at NIL as per the amended provisions of law, in view of the judgment of the Constitutional Bench in case of CIT V. Gold Co. Ltd. [1970] 78 ITR 16 which has been referred to in Escorts Farms (Ramgarh) Ltd. (supra), Section 55(2)(aa) which came into operation on 01/04/1996 and therefore the transaction of disposing of original share on average price is required to be benefited to the appellant and ought to have been accepted by the AO which has been referred by the Tribunal. Thus, this issue is also answered in favour of appellant-assessee and against the Departme .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates