Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (7) TMI 527

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tribunal'), the revenue has preferred the present Tax Appeals assailing the following orders: Tax Appeal No. Date of Tribunal's order ITA No. Assessment Year 547/2008 29.06.2007 2444/Ahd/2006 2003-04 757/2008 29.06.2007 2482/Ahd/2005 2001-02 579/2008 29.06.2007 2731/Ahd/2006 2003-04 578/2008 29.06.2007 672/Ahd/2007 2003-04 576/2008 29.06.2007 2801/Ahd/2006 2003-04 571/2008 29.06.2007 23/Ahd/2007 2003-04 562/2008 29.06.2007 22/Ahd/2007 2001-02 563/2008 29.06.2007 2876/Ahd/2006 2003-04 551/2008 29.06.2007 2527/Ahd/2006 2001-02 559/2008 29.06.2007 1298/Ahd/2005 2001-02 560/2008 29.06.2007 24/Ahd/2007 2003-04 1719/2008 19.10.2007 1250/Ahd/2007 2003-04 460/2009 29.02.2008 4249/Ahd/2007 2004 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not granted to the assessee but to the landowner and the rights and the obligations under the said approval were not transferable, and when the transfer of dwelling units in favour of the end-users was made by the landowner and not by the assessee? TAX APPEAL NO. 729 OF 2009 (A) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in allowing deduction u/s.80IB(10) r.w.s.80IB(1) to the assessee when the approval by the local authority as well as completion certificate was not granted to the assessee but to the landowner and the rights and the obligations under the said approval were not transferable, and when the transfer of dwelling units in favour of the end-users was made by the landown .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ikh, learned advocate appearing for the revenue submitted that the finding of the Tribunal that for deduction u/s 80IB(10) it is not necessary for the assessee himself to have the approval of the local authority centres around the interpretation of section 80IB(10) without appreciating that this is only a machinery provision and the substantive provision for the relevant deduction is Section 80IB(1) which must be read along with the former. He submitted that the undertaking of the assessee and it is the housing project of the assessee's undertaking that has tobe approved by the local authority. 4. Mr. Manish Shah, learned advocate appearing for the assessee submitted that the Tribunal is justified in reversing the order of CIT(A). He has d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ood differently in different context. For the limited purpose of deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act, the assessee had satisfied the condition of ownership also; even if it was necessary. 42. In the case of Shakti Corporation similarly the assessee had entered into a development agreement with the land owners on similar terms and conditions. It is true that there were certain minor differences, however, in so far as all material aspects are concerned, we see no significant or material difference. Here also assessee was given full rights to develop the land by putting up the housing project at its own risk and cost. Entire profit flowing therefrom was to be received by the assessee. It is true that the agreement provided that the as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing heard learned advocates for both the sides and considering the question posed for consideration by us reproduced hereinabove and considering the decision of this Court in the case of Radhe Developers (Supra) and Swastik Associates (supra), the questions, which are raised in the present appeals are required to be answered in favour of the assessee. We are not giving any elaborate reasons for the same as in the case of Radhe Developers (Supra) and Swastik Associates (supra) it is held by this Court that assessees are entitled to benefit under section 80IB(10) even where title of lands had not passed on to assessees and in some cases, development permissions may also have been obtained in name of original land owners. Since the facts in th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates