TMI Blog2006 (12) TMI 518X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... : A. Hore ORDER T. K. Jayaraman (Technical Member) In terms of the impugned order, the applicant/appellant company is required to pay the duty amount of ₹ 21,16,226 (Rupees twenty-one lakh sixteen thousand two hundred and twenty-six). The brief facts of the case are that the applicant/appellant company carried out packaging of refractory bricks obtained from M/s. Tata Refracto ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er of the Assistant Commissioner dated 25-6-2004 on the ground that the penalty imposed is only ₹ 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand), and it should be equal to the service tax effected. Consequently, he has imposed a penalty of ₹ 21,16,226 (Rupees twenty-one lakh sixteen thousand two hundred and twenty-six) as per the provisions of section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 in the impugned order. L ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|