2008 (1) TMI 146

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t-of-turn disposal of their appeal. The stake involved in this case is not high enough to allow this application. However, as both sides have submitted that the issue is already covered by judicial authorities, we have chosen to hear them further. It is submitted by ld. Counsel that the issue is covered in favour of the appellants by the decision of this Bench in Super Forgings and Steels Ltd. v. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a), we considered identical issue and, after noting the Apex Court's judgment in Veekayan Industries (supra), held as under :- '3. After considering the submissions, we note that the issue arising in this case is squarely covered against the Revenue by the Tribunal's decision in Syndet India case (supra). Para 3 of the Tribunal's order is reproduced below "In the decision of Singh Scrap Process .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X