9911796707
TMI Blog1967 (1) TMI 1X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gh Court of Calcutta are filed against the common judgment and order of that court in four civil revision cases arising but of the proceedings under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 (Act XV of 1940). The facts may be briefly stated. The appellant was a registered firm with four partners. For the accounting years ending with March 31 of the years 1942, 1943, 1944 and 1945 the said firm was assess ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rned. The Certificate Officer rejected the objections. Against the said order of the Certificate Officer, the appellant firm preferred appeals under section 51 of the Act to the Commissioner, Presidency Division. The said Commissioner on April 18, 1958, dismissed the said appeals. Revision petitions filed by the firm to the Board of Revenue were rejected on April 21, 1960. The petitions filed by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ture of the cases, it will require a long time for its verification. In the meantime, Certificate Officer may be requested to keep the proceedings pending. " Again on July 30, 1958, the concerned Income-tax Officer wrote to the Certificate Officer thus : " As the partners of the above C. Dr. (Certificate Debtor) are entitled to heavy refunds the collection proceedings in the above certificat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... should be free to take all steps to see that execution of the certificates is not barred by limitation, immediate steps should be taken for the completion of the pending refund proceedings, if any, so that the moneys, if any, due to the petitioner-firm on account of refund may be ascertained and the refund order, if any, of the petitioner-firm or its partners may be speedily issued. " Learned co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
