9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (10) TMI 129X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... wa, Member (Judicial) and Mr. B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) Sh. Rathim M., Advocates for the Appellant Sh. Amit Singh, Advocate for the D.A. Sh. Govind Dixit, AR for the Revenue Ms. Reena Khair, Sh. Rajesh Sharma and Ms. Rita Jha, Advocates for the Domestic Industry. ORDER The present appeal is by M/s Hubei Hongyuan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., China P.R., a manufacturer and exporter of me ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect goods originating in or exported from China P.R. After First sunset review the AD duty was continued vide Notification dated 05.04.2006 (Customs notification No. 61/2006-Cus. dated 15.06.2006). The present impugned notification of the D.A. consequent upon second sunset review is under challenge now. 3. The Id. Counsel for the appellants contested the Findings of the D.A. on various grounds. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... D.A. 5. The first issue raised by the appellant is that the domestic industry is also one of the major importer of subject goods and hence the investigation on anti dumping should not have continued. We note that this issue was considered by the DA and after noting these facts excluded M/s Aarti Drugs from the purview of domestic industry. He concluded that M/s Unichem Laboratories Constitutes, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s at Rs. 526/ kg. which was applicable during the POI - 01.01.2010 to 31.12.2010. The price was fixed at Rs. 514/ kg. vide Notification dated 01.07.2011 and again at Rs. 588/ kg. Notification dated 16.11.2012. The DA has correctly applied the rate of Rs. 526/ kg. applicable to the relevant time. The appellant also contended that the DA failed to establish the casual link for likelihood of dumping ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
