2016 (10) TMI 230

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ORDER Per M. V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against order-in-appeal No. SVS/154/NGP-I/2005 dated 27.6.2005. 2. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Since the matter is of 2005 and on perusal of the records and seems to be lying in a narrow compass, we take up the appeal for disposal even in the absence of any representation from the appellant. 3. Heard the learned departmental repre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... any central excise duty. We are unable to accept this contention raised in the grounds of appeal. We find that the appellant has undoubtedly raised a supplementary invoice on the basis of the price escalation given by MSEB. The transformers/finished goods have already been dispatched to MSEB. If that be so, the central excise duty is liable to be paid as soon as the invoices are raised. 5. The f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X