9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (10) TMI 296X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pore citizen - no stay obtained by the Department to implement the order - Held that: - as on date there is no order of stay granted by the Revisional Authority. Therefore, the Department bound to implement the order passed by the first respondent. However, the Court inclined to grant some time to the Department to move an application for stay before the Revisional Authority, if they so desire. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondents : Mrs. R. Hemalatha ORDER Heard Mr.B.Satish Sundar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and with their consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to implement the order passed by the first ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... preferred appeals to the first respondent and the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), who by an order dated 23.03.2015, partly allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner and reduced the redemption fine to ₹ 6,00,000/- from ₹ 13,00,000/- and penalty to ₹ 1,50,000/- from ₹ 2,50,000/-, however, rejected the appeal preferred by the Revenue. 5. The learned counsel for the peti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Joint Secretary (Revision Application), Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi. 7. Be that as it may, admittedly, as on date there is no order of stay granted by the Revisional Authority. Therefore, the second respondent is bound to implement the order passed by the first respondent. However, this Court is inclined to grant some time to the Department to move an application for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
