9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (3) TMI 1702X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... see is directed against the order dated 14.11.2008 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2005-06. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds in this appeal: 1. The ld. AO has wrongly assessed by demanding the tax of ₹ 181,8201; 2. The Ld CIT(A) has ordered that the society is not entitled to relief under section 80IA(4)(I) whereas we had argued for the relief of tax on the ba ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mutuality though the assessee has also claimed the deduction u/s 80IA. He has referred the assessment order as well as the order of the CIT(A) and submitted that both the AO and the CIT(A) has not adjudicated the issue of principle of mutuality . He has also referred the letter dated 9.7.2008 and submitted that the assessee has ITA No. 801/Mum/2009 (Assessment year 2005-06) 3 duly raised the is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hich is not owned by a company as defined in the IT Act or consortium of such companies are entitled to the benefits u/s 80IA, even if all other conditions laid down in that section is satisfied The assessee has failed the test of qualification for deduction u/s 80IA o f the IT Act. The main point in question is whether the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 80IA, when it is not owned by a com ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has not been adjudicated. Similarly, the CIT(A) has decided the appeal of the assessee in paragraph 7.4 as under : 7.4 in view of the above facts and legal position, I am not in a position to interfere with the order of the AO. The disallowance of the claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) at ₹ 47,69,410/- made by the AO is, therefore, confirmed 10. From the orders of the lower authoriti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
