TMI Blog2016 (4) TMI 1160X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , AC(AR) for the Respondent (s) Per Sri H.K. Thakur 1. This Restoration Applications have been filed by the Appellant with respect to FO/A/75719-75720/2015 dated 03.12.2015. 2. Sri K.K. Sanyal, Consultant appearing on behalf of the Appellant argued that Order dated 03.12.2015 was passed by this bench without hearing the Appellant. He relied upon the case law of Hon'ble High Court of Madras in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . The restoration of Order dated 03.12.2015 passed by this Bench, therefore, cannot be allowed as this court has no power to review its own Order. 5. It is observed from the case law Alfred Berg & Co. (I) (P) Ltd. vs. Cestat, Chennai (supra) that no summon was served upon the petitioner. Whereas in the present case the notice issued to the Appellant has not been returned undelivered. Sri K.K. San ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|