9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 423X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... xit, Asst. Comm. (AR) for the Respondent. ORDER Per: Raju 1. The appellants are manufacturer of ingots. During the search by the Revenue in the premises of the appellants, stock taking was done and excess of finished goods was found as compared to the recorded stock. The details as per the statement of Shri Pramod H Garg, Manager of the appellant is as follows: 31.98.09 Opening balance ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Act, 1944. 3. The learned Counsel for the appellant argued that the goods were not finished and therefore, the same were not entered in the records. It was their claim that the goods were unfinished and therefore, she argued that the same would have entered in the records after finishing. She also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE Vs. Continental Chemicals 2002 (140) ELT 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d without payment of duty. From the statement of Shri Pramod Garg, it is seen that 21.498 MTs were manufactured on 01/09/2009 upto 1400 hrs. In these circumstances, it is obvious that the goods manufactured during the period when the Revenue was searching the premises were not recorded in the statutory records. This can hardly be believed that such unaccountal was intended for clandestine clearanc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
