TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 856X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .N. Panda None present for the appellant. Ld. DR explains that the appellant has used the brand name of others for which the SSI exemption benefit under Notification No. 1/93-CE dated 01.03.1993, No. 59/1994-CE dated 01.03.1994 and 8/2001-CE dated 01.03.2001 is not admissible to it placing judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kali Aerated Water Works Vs. CCE, Madurai - 2015 (320) ELT 692 (S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat Hon'ble High Court of Madras in Writ appeals No. 1570 - 1576, 1578/1994, made an interim direction that appellant has to deposit 50% of the current excise duty demand as well as to furnish security for the balance demand to the satisfaction of the authority. But, Revenue could not inform whether appeals have been disposed of. 3. The ownership of the trade mark has been settled by the Apex Cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|