9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 1331X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Dixit, AC (AR) for the respondent Per: M.V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. BR/26/TH-I/2005 dated 17.03.2005. 2. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Since the appeal is of 2005, we take up the appeal for disposal in the absence of any representation. 3. Heard the ld. D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e in order to inflate the aggregate value and denying them the benefit; it is also the case of the appellant that the revenue authorities have included the value of the clearances in relation to the goods manufactured by them under chapter 39 for which they were eligible for benefit of notification 53/88-CE. 6. We find that as regards the inclusion of the value of the clearances of excisable good ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ew of this, we hold that the value of the finished goods manufactured under chapter 39 needs to be excluded from the aggregate value of clearances of any year. 8. As regards the total clearances value, we do find some merits in the submission made in the grounds of appeal by the appellant, as the value seems to include the trading activity also and the work done on job work basis. Revenue has inc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
