2001 (11) TMI 7

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uch receipts whereas the claim of the assessee for extra expenditure was found to be incorrect - Held, yes - Civil Appeal No 8176 of 2001 - - - Dated:- 29-11-2001 - S. P. Bharucha C.J.I, Shivaraj V. Patil and Arijit Pasayat JJ. For the Appellant : Mukul Rohtagi, Additional Solicitor General of India (Ms. Neera Gupta and B. V. Balaram Das, Advocates) For the Respondent : H. A. Raichu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Appellate Tribunal from which the question has arisen. We think that the question does require the consideration of the High Court. We do not, however, express any view on the merits of the case on either side. The civil appeal is allowed. The order under challenge is set aside, in so far as it relates to question No. 2 before the High Court. The said question (quoted above) shall stand referre .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X