9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 734X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 19.11.2013 vide which the Commissioner (A) has rejected the refund of the appellant on the ground of non-furnishing of the requisite documents and correlation statements. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellant is registered under Service Tax for providing services under the category of Information Technol ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eal before Commissioner (A), who vide Order dated 19.11.2013 upheld the Order-in-Original. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed the appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable as the same has been passed without seeing the documents produced by the appella ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rvices Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CST: 2016 (8) TMI 990 CESTAT Mumbai. 5. On the other hand, the learned AR reiterated the findings of the impugned order. 6. After considering the submissions of both the parties and perusal of the material on record, I am of the considered opinion that this case needs to be remanded back to the original authority to examine the documents already produced by the appellant and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
