2012 (9) TMI 1079

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant ought to have been accepted at 5.29 per unit as adopted by the appellant - addition made u/s 80IA on account of exclusion of electricity duty -
MR. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI AND MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI MS PAURAMI B SHETH FOR THE APPELLANT ORAL ORDER (Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) The appellant Revenue has challenged order dated 17th June 2011 made by the Income Tax Appellate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4-05. Learned counsel for the appellant has very candidly drawn the attention of the Court to the judgment and order dated 22nd November 2011 passed by this Court in the assessee's own case in Tax Appeal No.209 of 2010 wherein similar questions had been raised. The Court, for the reasons stated in the said order, found that the impugned order of the Tribunal did not give rise to any question .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X