2016 (12) TMI 1334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa: The appellant, who are engaged in the commercial and industrial construction activities, have been denied the benefit of abatement in terms of Notification No. 15/2004-ST dated 10.9.2004 and subsequent Notification No. 1/2006-ST dated 1.3.2006, on the ground that the service provider has supplied the cement, steel and RMC, free of cost. 2. We find that the issue n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... w declared in the above referred decisions. 4. No objection by ld. Advocate. 6. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the original adjudicating authority. We make it clear that we have not examined any aspect and have not given any findings on them. All the issues are kept open for the adjudicating authority to re-decide. ( Dictated & pronounced in open Court )

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X