9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1369X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eard Mr.B.Satish Sundar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner in this Writ Petition seeks for a direction to the respondents to release the imported goods, which were imported by Bill of Entry Nos. 2001098 dated 23.07.2015 and 2361119 dated 25.08.2015. 3. This writ petition has been heard by this c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ese origin and therefore, the petitioner is liable to pay anti-dumping duty and the amount payable as duty will be more than Rs. 56 Lakhs. 5. After elaborately hearing the parties, this Court suggested that if the interest of revenue is safeguarded, the prayer for provisional release can be considered by them. The gap between admitted duty and penal duty is wide. The petitioner is not in a positi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ear on the date fixed for personal hearing without seeking for any adjournment. iv.After conclusion of the personal hearing, the respondents are directed to pass final orders, within a period of four weeks from the date on which personal hearing was concluded. v.It is made clear that the time limit fixed is not only for the Department to complete the adjudication, but for the petitioner as wel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
