2016 (12) TMI 1459

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Bansal, Advocate for the respondent ORDER Rajesh Bindal, J. This order shall dispose of CEA Nos. 65,59, 67 and 68 of 2015. The facts are noticed from CEA No. 65 of 2015. The appeal has been preferred against the order dated 30.03.2015 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeal No. E/394/2007 raising in the following substantial questions of law:- " .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been quite active in execution of their modus-operandi as discussed above, as per the directions of their Managing Director. (iii) Whether the impugned order passed by the ld. Tribunal is justified and in accordance with law. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection referring to the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Panchku .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X