2017 (1) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s, rebars, pastable items, ceramic tiles etc. A show-cause notice was issued proposing to recover credit of Rs. 33,16,916/- covering the period October 2007 to June 2008 and also proposing to impose penalties. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand, interest and imposed equal amount of penalty besides ordering confiscation of the subject items used for fabrication and thus imposed redemption fine of Rs. 50 lakhs. Being aggrieved, the appellants are now before the Tribunal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, the learned counsel Shri G. Prahlad explained that the MS plates, angles, channels, steel tubes etc. were used for fabrication of capital goods / parts / components. That appellants had furnished Chartered Eng .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d. Mundra Ports & SEZ Ltd. Vs. CCE [2015(39) STR 726 (Guj.)] e. India Cements Ltd. Vs. CESTAT, Chennai [2015(321) ELT 209 (Mad.)] f. CCE&C, Visakhapatnam-I Vs. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. [2011(267) ELT 311 (AP)] g. CCE&ST Vs. India Cements Ltd. [2014(310) ELT 636 (Mad.)] h. Sanghvi Forging & Engineering Ltd. Vs. CCE, Vadodara-II [2014(302) ELT 136 (Tri. Ahmd.)] i. CCE, Mumbai Vs. Shree Chhatrapati Shahu Co-op Sugar Factory Ltd. [2006(206) ELT 697 (Tri. Mumbai)] j. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur-II [2002(147) ELT 996 (Tri. Del.)] k. Commissioner Vs. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. [2005(183) ELT A159 (SC)] l. Diamond Cement Vs. CCE, Bhopal [2005(191) ELT 702 (Tri. Del.)] 3. On behalf of the Department, learned AR Shri Nag .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... el of the facility for transportation provided inside the factory premises. The learned counsel has relied on the judgment laid in the case of CCE, Mumbai Vs. Shree Chhatrapati Shahu Co.Op. Sugar Factory Ltd. (supra) in which the pipes and fittings used for carrying spent wash (hazardous waste) from distilleries to compost yard, situated outside factory was held to be part and parcel of the pollution control system and has to be treated as capital goods. The credit was held to be admissible. The Tribunal in the said case observed that pipeline fittings within the factory and outside the factory cannot be segregated but has to be treated as one entity as it situates within the factory premises itself. 6. In J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. Vs. CCE, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X