2017 (1) TMI 628

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Aforesaid question has already been considered by this Court in M/s Tikaula Sugar Mills Limited Vs. C.I.T., Muzaffar Nagar [2012 (10) TMI 619 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT ] the reference to DVO under Section 142-A is not to make a fishing and roving enquiry into the expenditure in constructions. The AO is not authorised to call for the report of DVO unless he forms an opinion that he cannot rely on the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D', New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal") in Income Tax Appeal Nos.426 & 427/Del/2004(Assessment Year 1995-96 & 1996-97). 2. The appeal was admitted on following substantial questions of law: "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in holding that notice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the share application money was disclosed in the accounts books, which were accepted and the assessments were finalised and thus the same material, namely the payment of upfront fees and the receipt of the share application money, could not be a ground reopen the assessment. We also find that the AO did not call the assessee-company to explain the difference of ₹ 3,75,500/- as up-front fees .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X