Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (1) TMI 1037

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in directing inclusion of the two companies in the list of comparables, ignoring the fact that consistently loss making companies and companies having high fluctuations in margins over the years does not reflect comparable conditions? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and despite the prescription of parameters of comparability by Rule 10 B(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, the Tribunal was correct in law, in directing the inclusion of DEPB in turnover and depreciation in net profit for the purpose of profit margin of comparables and assessee? 3. Regarding question (i) : (a) The respondent assessee is inter alia engaged in the business of e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt year as they had suffered losses during the year and the respondent had not analysed the reason for the losses. It also stated that FAR (Function, Assets and Risks) analysis of the two companies with that of the appellant had not been done. Therefore, SEL and VTI could not be used as comparables to determine the ALP of the respondent assessee's sales to A.E. (c) Being aggrieved, the respondent assessee carried the issue in appeal to the Tribunal. The impugned order records the fact that the two companies viz. SEL and VTI which have been excluded from the list of comparables for the subject assessment year were in fact accepted / adopted by the Revenue in the immediately preceding Assessing Year 200708. The Tribunal further held that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... parability of an international transaction (or a specified domestic transaction] with an uncontrolled transaction shall be judged with reference to the following, namely:- (a) the specific characteristics of the property transferred or services provided in either transaction; (b) the functions performed, taking into account assets employed or to be employed and the risks assumed, by the respective parties to the transactions; (c) the contractual terms (whether or not such terms are formal or in writing) of the transactions which lay down explicitly or implicitly how the responsibilities, risks and benefits are to be divided between the respective parties to the transactions; (d) conditions prevailing in the markets in which the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... examination / enquiry ought to have been done by the Revenue to find out that whether the loss was a symptom of the reference points in Rule 10B(2) of the Rules making it noncomparable. This is more so as the Revenue before us does not dispute that otherwise the two companies are comparable to the respondent assessee even on the parameters laid down in Rule 10B(2) of the Rules. Therefore, if in the present facts, the Revenue seeks to discard the two companies SEL and VTI from the comparables for the subject assessment year, the onus would be upon the Revenue to justify the same. (h) In the above view, in the present facts, the the view taken by the Tribunal in the impugned order is a possible view. Accordingly, question (i) as proposed doe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... similar. So far as the depreciation is concerned, the impugned order of the Tribunal adopted the same reasoning which it had applied while holding that DEPB benefit is includable in arriving at the net profit in its order in the earlier Assessment Years 200506 and 200708 in the subject assessment year with regard to the claim of depreciation. Therefore, the DEPB was includable in arriving at the operating profit and depreciation was includable while arriving at the total costs of the respondent assessee as the same is not excluded in arriving at the profits of the comparable companies. (d) We find that so far as exclusion of DEPB benefit in arriving at the operating profit of the respondent assessee is concerned, the order of the Tribunal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates