9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 1103X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... RDER Heard Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned Counsel for the department and Sri Prakash Chandra, learned Counsel for the assessee. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2001-2002. The questions of law sought to be answered are hereunder:- "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances, the Hon'ble ITAT is legally correct in holding that there ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... confirming the finding of the CIT (Appeals)-1, Agra in deleting the aforesaid addition of Rs. 88,06,515/-, following its own decision dated 29.3.2007 in I.T.A. No.241/Agr./2002 for A.Y. 1998-99 and order dated 30.3.2007 in ITA No.26/Agra/ 2004 for A.Y. 2000-2001 which has not been accepted and a separate appeal u/s 260A of I.T. Act, 1961 has been filed against the said orders ? 4. Whether the Ho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... R 44 ? 6. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances, the Hon'ble ITAT is legally correct in holding that that issue relating to inclusion of excise duty amounting to Rs. 3,44,914/- in the cost of raw material for finished goods is covered by the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Southern Asbestos Cement Ltd. - 259 ITR 631 whereas the said addition was made followin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
