2017 (2) TMI 488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... xus of these services with regard to output services of appellant and had held that the appellant is eligible for refund - appellant eligible for refund - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - ST/28291, 28292/2013 - A/30022-30023/2017 - Dated:- 5-1-2017 - Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S., Member (Judicial) Shri. Thirumalai, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri. Nagraj Nails Deputy Comm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Order-in-Original No. Order-in-Appeal No. Oct 2008 to Dec 2008 (original proceedings) 59,28,155/- - 59,28,155/- Not issued 128/2011-S.Tax (Refund), dated 28.10. 2011 14/2012 (HYD-II) S.Tax dated 29.02.2012 Oct 2008 to 2008 (denovo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppellant is shown as under: Particulars Refund Rejected Rejection Appealed Renting of Immovable Property 1,78,754 1,78,754 Supply of Tangible goods services 9,592 9,592 Management, Maintenance and Repair Services .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4,766 44,766 Total refund amount rejected 15,67,620 15,37,083 The Tribunal in the appellants own case for a different period vide Final Order No. A/30065/2016 dated 20.01.2016 and A/30160/2016 dated 04.02.2016 had analyzed the issue in detail the nexus of these services with regard to output services of app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X