2017 (2) TMI 1135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... H 8529? - Held that: - this Tribunal in the case of appellant, M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd, M/s Moser Baer India Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs, Noida [2015 (10) TMI 2258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] have decided the classification of impugned LCD Panels to be under Tariff Item No. 9013 80 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellants.
Mr. Anil Choudhary, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CTV regularly. However, a dispute regarding classification of such goods arose. The appellant was claiming classification under Tariff Item No. 9013 80 10 (which attracted NIL rate of duty) whereas Revenue wanted to assess the goods under Chapter SH 8529. The similar issue was earlier decided by the Commissioner (Appeals) against the appellant vide OIA Nos. 177-179/Cus/APPL/NOIDA/11 dated 10.01.2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... C/317/2011 66/Cus/Appeal/Noida/2011 dated 15003.2011 OIA No, 177-179 dated 25.0602010 and OIA No. 274281/2010 dated 31.0882010 However, in the Appeal No. C/623/2010, the impugned Order-in-Appeal No. 274-281/CUS/APPL/NOIDA/2010 dated 31.08.2010 was passed earlier and the same was relied upon in the Order-in-Appeal No. 07/CUS/APPL/NOIDA/11 dated 10.01.2012 has already been set aside. Therefore, t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X