Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (3) TMI 72

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... towards Unexplained Investments without appreciating that the Appellant had submitted complete docurnentary evidence for the source of funds. 2) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming an addition of Rs. 6,82,510/- towards payments made to Credit Card Company without appreciating that the same were made by the Company in which the Appellant is the Director and complete details of the same were filed before both the authorities. 3. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. 4. Facts in brief are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of providing Consultancy services in the field of Architecture. The assessee is also a partner of the Partners .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rs. 2,54,94,229/- which has been incurred by the assessee towards the purchase of property which remained unexplained investment in the hands of the assessee, was added in assessee's hand. 6. Before the CIT(A), assessee filed bank statements, cash flow statement, balance confirmation. CIT(A) asked the remand report and sent all these documents to the AO for his verification and report thereon. However, the AO was not satisfied with the genuineness of transaction and the source of funds, sent a negative remand report. 7. By the impugned order, CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO after observing as under:- Further, the Ld.AO has added an amount of R. 2,54,95,229/- toward investment in the property known 'Rewa House'. The Ld.AO ob .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d to pay Rs. 1 crore to Praveen Kumari towards 25% interest in the said property. Further, it is also abundantly clear from the said agreement that the appellant had paid Rs. 1.02 crore to Mr Banu P. Singh for facilitating the transaction with Praveen Kumari. Therefore, the appellant submitted that the total cost of the property comes to Rs. 2,54,95,229/ -which also includes the payment to the other facilitator and the stamp duty. I find that the appellant explained that the source of investment in the said property is from Shradha Realtors, where the appellant is a partner and in fact the loan confirmation was confirmed by the appellant itself, secondly M/ s. Cello Finance Corporation and thirdly from M/ s. Konark Realtors Pvt Ltd .. I fin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o invited to the source of funds placed in the paperbook indicating availability of sufficient funds in the account for meeting the payments so made. As per learned AR, all the transactions were recorded in the books of accounts, therefore, no addition was warranted on the plea of unexplained investments. 9. On the other hand, learned DR relied on the order of the lower authorities. 10. We have considered rival contentions and carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below and found from record that during the year under consideration, assessee has purchased 25% of undivided right in the property known as 'Rewa House' for a consideration of Rs. 1 crore. Total investment in the said property was shown at Rs. 2.54 crores. Howeve .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - towards payment made to credit card company. In the assessment order, AO observed that as per the AIR details, the assessee has incurred an expenditure of Rs. 6,82,510/- against credit card bills. In absence of any details furnished by the assessee, the source of fund of credit card expenses could not be verified. Accordingly, Rs. 6,82,510/- was added to the total income of the assessee as unexplained expenditure. 12. By the impugned order CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO. 13. We have considered rival contentions and found from record that the assessee is the Director of M/s. Konark Realtors Pvt. Ltd., and therefore the said payments were made by M/s. Konark Realtors Pvt. Ld., Hence there could have been no addition u/s.69 in the h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates