9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 117X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eha Garg, DR for the respondent. Per B. Ravichandran: The appeal is against order dated 30.09.2008 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Meerut. The appellant is an authorized dealer of motor vehicles for TVS Motor Company. The dispute in the present case relates to their tax liability on incomes under the category of "Publicity Expenses" and "Target Incentive". The impugned order confirmed the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submits that as per the declared policy of the manufacturer, made known to all the dealers through circulars, specific targets were fixed for sale of motor cycles. On exceeding the said target, monitory incentive eligible is also pre-notified. It is the case of the appellant that the incentive is relatable to the sale of goods and they have also benefitted in making more sales. There is no service ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ax under "BAS". 6. Regarding the tax liability for the consideration received as "Depot Expenses", it is clear that the same were paid by the manufacturer in pursuance of the declared policy for achieving the target in sales. The Tribunal on many earlier occasions examined similar set of facts with reference to sale of motor vehicles and receipt of target incentives through such sales. It was hel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
