2017 (3) TMI 152

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondents : Mr.K.Venkatesh ORDER 1.Issue Notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsels for parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2.The petitioner is aggrieved by the detention of the subject goods and accordingly, challenge is the goods detention notice dated 20.01. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .01.2017, raised by the petitioner on Mr.PR.Rajenthiran. 5.A perusal of the detention notice shows that the subject goods which are detained for the following reasons: "An Aircompressor transported from Pondicherry to Tiruchengode. The consignees TIN. No. Not mentioned in the invoice. Further the consignor Tvl. ATLAS COPCO (India) Pondicherry has not raised any sale invoice. This transaction is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... osed. 8.Mr.Venkatesh, who appears for the respondents says that, if, security is given in the form of Bank Guarantee, the detained goods i.e., Air Compressor would be released to the petitioner. 9.I must indicate herein that the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that offer to furnish security is made without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner to challenge both .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X