TMI Blog1967 (8) TMI 16X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Civil Procedure Code X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... these sections to prevent a person from being asked whether he had shown a particular asset or income in his income-tax return for a particular year, or otherwise. The privilege is sought to be based upon section 137(1) and (2) of the Income-tax Act (43 of 1961), and on certain observations of Mockett J. in Velayudham Pillai v. Subramania Pillai. When this matter is examined carefully, it will at ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... simpliciter whether he had included a particular asset or income in his income-tax return, or inhibiting a party from replying to such a question. The Bench of Veeraswami J. and Krishnaswamy Reddy J. observed in Sivagami Achi v. Ramanathan Chettiar that section 137 did not create an obligation, privilege or right. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner brings it to my notice that in the l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r declines to reply, and the revision petitioner desires to refute the reply by producing the original document, the question whether the revision petitioner can thus attempt to procure the original return from the department, is a different matter altogether. That will concern the obligations and rights of the income-tax authorities and it will have to be dealt with on the provisions of the Incom ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|