9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 1377X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . We, therefore, allow deduction of ₹ 23.60 crore. TDS u/s 195 - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) - assessee paid the sum to ICC without deducting tax at source - AO formed a view that such payment is in the nature of Royalty or Fees for technical services requiring deduction of tax at source - DRP held that 'the benefits availed by the assessee from ICC did not fall within the ambit of Royalty or FTS’ and accordingly no disallowance was called for - Held that:- Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) is made when the assessee fails to deduct tax at source etc. in terms of section 195 before making payment to a non-resident. This section, in turn, provides that no payment should be made to non-resident without deduction of tax at source which is chargeable to tax in his hands. Thus, chargeability of income to tax in the hands of a non-resident is a condition precedent. In other words, if such receipt is not chargeable to tax in the hands of the non-resident, there will be no liability on the part of the payer to withhold tax and consequently, there can be no question of disallowance u/s 40(a)(i). We have noted from Appendix 2 that the assessee was to pay `Rights fee’ to ICC even during the pr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e judgments of the Hon ble Delhi High Court in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Another vs. CIT (2015) 129 DTR 25 (Del) and CIT vs. Whirlpool of India Ltd. (2015) 94 CCH 156 DEL-HC to contend that the AMP expenses could not be considered as an international transaction. In the light of these judgments and some other Tribunal orders, it was submitted that there was no international transaction of AMP expenses on the basis of principles laid down in these judgments and, hence, the entire exercise of determining its ALP and, consequently, making transfer pricing adjustment, be set aside. 4. Before taking up the issue, it is relevant to summarily mention that the ld. AR argued the issue of AMP expenses on similar lines as has been argued in different cases, including the case of Nikon India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (2016) 47 CCH 0458 DelTrib contending that the incurring of AMP expenses is not an international transaction. The tribunal vide its order dated 15.7.2016 in the case of Nikon (supra) has not accepted such contention at its level and remitted the matter to the file of AO/TPO for a fresh determination. 5. The ld. DR, similar to Nikon s case (supra), relied on the judgment ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dt. 23.8.2016) in all of which similar issue has been restored for fresh determination in the light of the earlier judgment in Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) . The ld. DR argued that the Hon ble Delhi High Court in its earlier decision in Sony Ericson Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT (2015) 374 ITR 118 (Del) has held AMP expenses to be an international transaction. It was argued the matter should be restored for a fresh determination. 6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. It is a matter of record that the Hon ble High Court in assesee s own case [with the lead order in Sony Ericsson (supra) ] has held AMP expenses as an international transaction. It can be seen that in some later decisions, view taken is at variance. Equally, the tribunal is also not consistent in its stand. When the TPO in the instant case held AMP expenses to be an international transaction, he did not have any occasion to consider the ratio laid down in several judgments of the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court, which is now available for consideration. Respectfully following the predominant view taken in several T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ce in the books of account of customers/franchisees. However, where the debit balance in the books of accounts of the assessee was less than the balance in the books of the parties/franchisees, such an explanation was not accepted. On this basis, the AO drew a Table on pages 14 and 15 of the final assessment order computing difference between the closing balance as per the customers books and closing balance as per assessee s books in respect of four parties with total difference of ₹ 22,53,91,889/-. An addition was made for this amount, against which the assessee is aggrieved. 8. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. It is found that the A.O. made the addition on the basis of difference in the closing balance of the assessee as shown by the four customers in their books of account and the closing balance of such customers as shown by the assessee in its books of account. The assessee contended before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) that the copies of such accounts maintained by the customers were not made available to it before making the addition. It was requested that full copies of account be provided by the DRP. The assess ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for a sum of ₹ 8.27 crore towards `Store closure expenses by means of a revised return. It was contended that this amount, recorded in the books of accounts for the succeeding A.Y. 2012-13, was classified as a Prior period expense and voluntarily disallowed in the computation of income for such later year. A revised return was filed for the year under consideration claiming deduction for such expense pertaining to the instant year. The A.O did not allow this expenditure. The DRP observed that the closing of stores had a trait of permanency and, as such, it was a capital expenditure. The A.O made addition for this sum and the assessee has come in appeal before us. 10. Having heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record, it is seen that the assessee has placed on record an Annexure running into 6-7 pages which contains details of store closure expenses. This Annexure has columns, such as, Name of the store, Status as on 31.3.2012, Franchisee name, Date of opening, Date of closure, Interior cost, Running months and Value of interior etc. Sum total of the column `Interior cost is ₹ 8.27 crore, which the assessee claimed as deduction. The b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ith total of ₹ 28.90 lac has been drawn of such items at pages 19 to 21 of the assessment order. This amount comprises of ₹ 6,84,487/-, being TDS and interest paid on revision of TDS return; and ₹ 22,05,516/-, which is in small parts having narrations, such as, Gym maintenance charges, CST demand, Screening charges of movie My name is Khan , Running club classes. It was opined that the amount of ₹ 28.90 lac was not in the nature of `Legal and professional charges and hence no deduction was warranted. Addition was made for this sum. The assessee is aggrieved against this disallowance. 13. Having heard both the sides perused the relevant material on record, we find that the Table drawn by the A.O on pages 19 to 21 of the assessment order contains details of expenses which are obviously not in the nature of legal and professional expenses. But the fact that a particular expense has been wrongly classified in the accounts, does not lose deduction, if it is otherwise deductible as per law. Since there are several items noted on these three pages as details of this amount, we consider it expedient to set aside the assessment order and remit the matter to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng year ending on 31.3.2010 stood at ₹ 173.41 crore. This shows that the amount of advance has come down slightly vis-a-vis the preceding year. The ld. AR contended that no disallowance of interest on such outstanding brought forward Loans and Advances receivable was made in the preceding year. This contention has not been controverted on behalf of the Revenue. We find that the A.O has simply computed the disallowance of interest in proportion to the amount of interest bearing unsecured loans obtained amounting to ₹ 502.69 crore and interest free advances given amounting to ₹ 172.59 crore. The fact that the assessee did pay interest on such unsecured loans has not been disputed. In view of the fact that the assessee paid interest on unsecured loans and did not earn any interest on advances given, we cannot disallow proportionate interest genuinely paid on unsecured loans taken for business purpose. Section 36(1)(iii) simply provides that deduction is allowable for `the amount of interest paid in respect of capital borrowed for the purpose of business. As the assessee paid interest on capital borrowed for the business purpose and it is not the case of the AO tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... FTS and accordingly no disallowance was called for. The Revenue is aggrieved against this direction. 19. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on record. The AO proposed disallowance of the amount u/s 40(a)(i) in the draft order, as in his opinion, the assessee made payment of royalty or alternatively, fees for technical services to ICC without deduction of tax at source, on which tax withholding was warranted. Section 40(a)(i) of the Act provides that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in sections 30 to 38, no deduction shall be allowed in computing the income chargeable under the head Profits and gains of business or profession of royalty, fees for technical services or other sum chargeable under this Act, which is payable outside India; or in India to a non-resident, not being a company or to a foreign company, on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or, after deduction, has not been paid on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139. Explanation to this provision stipulates that : `For the purposes of this sub-Clause, (A) royalty shall have the same meaning ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n hands of a non-resident when it is paid, inter alia, by a resident. This manifests that if the payment made by the assessee in India to a non-resident ICC gets covered within the scope of `royalty or `fees for technical services , it will be chargeable to tax in India under the Act, thereby fixing liability on the assessee to deduct tax at source. Failure of the assessee to deduct tax at source from such payment, in that eventuality, would entail disallowance u/s 40(1)(ia) of the Act to mar the claim of such deduction in its hands. 21. Now we will examine if the payment made by the assessee to ICC is in the nature of royalty as per 9(1)(vi) or fees for technical services under section (9)(vii) of the Act. In order to determine the correct nature of payment it is relevant to consider the relevant clauses of the Official Partner Agreement dated 11.09.2007 entered into between the assessee and ICC Development (International) Limited (hereinafter referred to as `the Agreement ). A copy of such Agreement has been placed on record. Preamble of the Agreement, styled as `Background , states that ICC is the Official International Governing Body for Cricket and the assessee (referred ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... exclusive in that IDI has not granted, and will not grant, substantially similar rights in relation to an ICC Event and the Product Category. Otherwise, all rights granted under this Agreement are nonexclusive; and (b) represent the entire extent of the rights granted to it and are limited to Products. All rights and opportunities not expressly granted to Company under this Agreement are reserved by IDI. 24. On going through the above Clause, it emerges that the assessee was granted : `promotional, advertising, marketing and other rights and opportunities with respect to the Products including Appendix 3 w.r.t. ICC events and specified ICC functions; and Appendix 4 w.r.t. Apparel Rights. 25. Clause 4, which is relevant for our purpose, reads as under:- 4. APPROVALS AND USE OF MARKS Company acknowledges that each and every use of a Mark requires IDI's prior written approval. Company must submit to IDI for its prior written approval using IDI's approval system, complete and accurate representations of the final form samples (with an English translation where applicable) of any Advertising Materials, and any other proposed use of the Marks on or in conn ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... other commercial affiliates etc. 27. Clause 7 of the Agreement defines Rights fees and VIK as under:- 7- RIGHTS FEE AND VIK Company must: (a) pay to IDI the Rights Fees; and (b) provide to IDI the VIK, in the manner and amount as specified in Appendix 2. Any and all payments and contributions to be made under this Agreement by Company to IDI must be made in freely transferable US dollars free and clear of, and without deduction or liability for, any and all taxes (including VAT), set-offs, deductions and/or withholdings of whatsoever nature which may be applicable in respect of such payment. All amounts payable hereunder that are not paid on the due date shall bear interest at the rate of three percent (3%) above the LIBOR (twelve months) rate for US$, as published by the Zurich periodical Finanz under Wirtschaft prorated on a daily basis. The payment of such interest shall be in addition to and not in substitution of any and all other remedies available to IDI in respect of nonpayment. Company must provide IDI with quarterly written reports during each year of the Term, setting out: (i) the aggregate value of VIK that Company has supplied; (ii) th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 0,000 USD by Champions Trophy / Twenty20 (April 2014, Bangladesh) ICC Cricket World Cup (February / March 2015, Australia / New Zealand 1,250,000 Total 4,000,000 4. Company must supply VIK as follows:- a) to IDI free of charge products together with the services of sufficient qualified personnel for the effective operation and satisfactory functioning of such product supply in accordance with the requirements specified in Appendix 4. b) to an aggregate value over the Term of US$3 million. The value of any item of VIK supplied must based on the lowest wholesale price at which company sells an equivalent product to any third party (including, where applicable, government purchasing agencies) and excluding any VAT or other taxes and c) Product must be delivered free of charge to IDI s head office or the location to be specified by IDI. 5. Products must be available for purchase by IDI from time to time in the requested quantities at wholesale price. 29. The above Appendix mandated upon the assessee to pay the `Rights fee of US $ 4 million in installments ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... this paragraph is irrevocably and unconditionally waived in respect of that Major Event; and (c) a reasonable number of tickets to a Development Event. 3.3 All tickets and passes must be used in accordance with the directions issued by IDI and their terms and conditions of use notified by IDI to Company. Company acknowledges and agrees that: a) tickets and passes may be used by Company only for hospitality and/or promotional purposes to promote Products in accordance with this Agreement and may not be sold/resold or offered for sale, and (b) ownership of all tickets and passes remains with IDI and they cannot be transferred or dealt with except as specifically permitted by IDI 3.4 Company agrees that if required by reason of Applicable Law and/or the safety and security requirements related to an ICC Event, it will provide IDI with the names and such evidence of identification of the users of all its tickets and passes as is required. 4 BOARDS AND SIGNAGE 4.1 The right to have 7.5% of all on Match ground perimeter boards for each Match of a Major Event and each televised Match of a development Event, the exact position of which shall be based on an equitable ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and subject to agreement with the concessionaires at any Stadium, Company has the right to display and sell Licensed Product at a Stadium during a Major Event through the existing concessionaires 6.2 These rights are subject to security restrictions, space availability and compliance with Applicable Laws, and must always be exercised solely in accordance with IDI'S and/or the Host's requirements and guidelines, including corporate and/or brand identification guidelines applicable at the Stadiums. The erection and operation at the Stadiums of any display or demonstration booths or other facilities including related staffing, security and storage shall be at Company's cost. All materials and equipment necessary for such activities (including to ISDN lines, telephone lines and utilities connections) will be Company's responsibility at its expense. Company will maintain adequate liability insurance vis-a-vis such activities to cover any claim against IDI resulting from or arising out of such activities, whether or not such claim arises during the Term. Company must inform IDI eight (8) months prior to commencement of each Major Event of the extent to which Company wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... TIONS 10.1 The right to have, free of charge, one (1) half-page colour advertisement in the Official Program of each ICC Event (subject to its production for a Development Event). IDI will give Company sixty (60 days notice of the closing date of print orders in respect of such Official Program. Company must furnish to IDI the finished and in proportion artwork for such advertising within such sixty (60) day period. 10.2 IDI shaft notify Company of the availability of Official Programs and Company must inform IDI of the number of Official Programs it would like to purchase at cost on or before the date which is thirty (30) days after such notification. 11. MATCH FOOTAGE AND ARCHIVE The non-exclusive right to use for internal use and promotional and advertising purposes, without payment of any fee to IDI (but subject to technical, duplication, shipping and handling costs); (a) up to thirty (30) minutes of past video (still and moving) of ICC events which took place prior to commencement of the term and in the ownership of IDI; and (b) up to two (2) minutes of footage from a Match not before than 72 hours after the end of that match provided that no more than t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y may source such proposed product or merchandise from a reputable third party. 13.4 Three (3) samples of each Premium must be submitted to IDI for archive purposes 14 CRICKET ZONES AND EVENT PROMOTIONS 14.1 IDI and/or Host may establish a separate area for fan entertainment during a Major Event (Cricket Zone). The right, at Company's expense, to operate branded interactive fan activities at any Cricket Zone in accordance with this paragraph. 14.2 IDI must notify Company at least nine (9) months prior to an ICC Cricket World Cup and six (6) months prior to each other Major Event of its intentions regarding the establishment of a Cricket Zone. Company must meet with IDI not more than three (3) months prior to such events and outline to IDI the precise nature of its proposed activities and provide fully costed budgets, for approval by IDI in consultation with Company. Company activities must be principally directed towards fan entertainment or participation and not solely consist of Product retailing, promotion or branding. 14.3 Company is responsible for all necessary insurances, personnel, equipment and security to undertake its activities at the Cricket Zones. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ducts to the exclusion of any other products, services or entity unless the same is shown in accordance with the terms of the Third Party Guidelines; (vii) it must not contain any material which may reasonably be considered to be obscene, blasphemous or defamatory or which may reflect unfavourably on IDI, an ICC Event, or the sport of cricket; and (viii) Company is responsible for any non-compliance of the Microsite with any Applicable Laws. (c) Advertising Opportunity IDI (or its nominee) may exploit commercial opportunities on the Website in accordance with the following terms: (i) Company must be offered a first option to purchase the available commercial opportunities on the best available commercial terms. Such option must provide for an exclusive negotiation period of 30 days (except in the case of offers made in the period commencing 30 days prior to an ICC Event in which case the period shall be reduced to 7 days or if shorter the remaining time available until the relevant ICC Event), and (ii) no sponsorship or advertising opportunity relating to the Website may be offered to any person at a price which is less than that offered to Company without first ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etermined by IDI in the Host Country of an ICC Event or in Dubai. All parties attending will bear their own travel and accommodation expenses. The costs of the venue and refreshments for the workshop will be borne by IDI; (c) the right to use the trophy for each ICC Event for internal and external Company events provided that such use (i) is in compliance with the procedures established by IDI (including with respect to insurance and advance booking) and (ii) does not constitute and is not presented as a trophy tour; and (d) IDI will ensure that Company receives six (6) invitations per Major Event to any ICC official event function organised by or under the control of IDI), 19. ICC AWARDS The ICC Awards are an event staged in each year of the Term at a place and time decided by IDI around the Major Event staged in such year and in the host country of each such event. Company has the following rights in respect of each ICC Awards: (a) the right to six (6) tickets free of charge in each year of the Term: and (b) an acknowledgment in any official program of the ICC Awards and on the board at the entrance to the event, in each case in a manner to be determined by ID ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and staff for each ICC Event in a manner and timeframe as advised by IDI. 1.4 For the avoidance of doubt, the Product supplied under this paragraph 1 forms part of the VIK. 2. LICENSED PRODUCT 2.1 IDI appoints Company as its exclusive licensee of Cricket Equipment on the payment of royalty by Company to IDI of 6% or wholesale price of cricket bats and 5% of wholesale price of Cricket Equipment (other than cricket bats). 2.2 For the avoidance of doubt, IDI may appoint licensees whose products are not designed for the playing of cricket matches, including miniature bats, key rings, soft bats and balls and other toys and playthings. Such product will be unbranded. 2.3 IDI appoints Company as its non-exclusive licensee of Sports Apparel on the payment of a royalty by Company to ID; of 12.5% of wholesale price. 2.4 Before starting manufacture of any Licensed Product, Company must submit its request to IDI for its prior written approval in the manner and form as specified by IDI, including relevant details (such as proposed product, distribution channels and territories), preliminary artwork and a pre-production sample. 2.5 Company must produce a range of Licensed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ₹ 4.56 crore, which was disallowed by the AO u/s 40(a)(i) and no amount on account of `Royalty was paid during the year. This contention has not been controverted on behalf of the Revenue. And further, there is no averment in the assessment order about the payment of any `Royalty by the assessee on sale of the licensed products. 33. Thus we are left with to decide if the payment made by the assessee in the nature of Rights fee can be categorized as Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Act or `Fees for technical services u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Act. 34. Albeit, initially the ld. DR reiterated the stand of the AO that the payment of `Rights fee is both `Royalty as well as `Fees for technical services , but during the course of proceedings, he candidly accepted that this payment is in the nature of Royalty alone and not `Fees for technical services . In our considered opinion, the ld DR was fully justified in accepting that the payment of `Rights fee by the assessee can not be treated as `Fees for technical services because of the definition of fees for technical services given in explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) reading as under :- Explanation 2.-For the purposes o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng films or video tapes for use in connection with television or tapes for use in connection with radio broadcasting, but not including consideration for the sale, distribution or exhibition of cinematographic films ; or (vi) the rendering of any services in connection with the activities referred to in sub-Clauses (i) to (iv), (iva) and (v). 37. The ld. DR contended that the payment made by the assessee is covered within the purview of Clauses (iii), (iv) and (vi) of the Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi). Clause (iv) defines royalty as consideration for: `imparting of any information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill. From the relevant terms of the Appendix 3 reproduced above, it is manifest that ICC has not imparted any information concerning technical, industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge etc to the assessee. As such, the application of Clause (iv) is ousted. Clause (iii) refers to any payment as royalty which is paid for : `the use of any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property. Clause (vi) to the Explanation encompasses the rendering of services in c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot related to the manufacture and sale of the licensed products in the open market. Rights given under all the remaining Clauses, namely 3 to 21 of the Appendix fall in the first category of promotion and advertisement. These are `Tickets as per Clause 3, `Boards and signage as per Clause 4 under which the assessee acquired right to have 7.5% of any match ground perimeter boards, `Parking passes as per Clause 5, `Demonstration, sale and display of products as per Clause 6, `Backdrops as per Clause 7, `Instadia video screens , `Hospitality , `Match footage and archive etc. Clause 15 is a right of `Internet promotion , by which the assessee acquired the right to have its sponsorship of ICC Events promoted on the ICC website. Then Clause 20 of the Appendix is a right of `Commercial airtime , by which ICC provided the assessee one 30-second promotional spot for promotion during each match televised live. On a meticulous reading of all the Clauses of the Rights package as per Appendix 3, it becomes crystal clear that 20 out of 21 rights are exclusively for advertisement and promotion of the assessee in connection with ICC Events with or without the use of Designations and Marks ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . on goods manufactured and sold, gets covered in the definition of `Royalty as per Clause (iii) of Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. 41. We have noted above that `Rights fee is a one composite payment for a package of 21 rights given to the assessee as per Appendix 3. There is no bifurcation of consideration relatable to such rights individually. We have also seen above that apart from the payment of `Rights fee , this Agreement also requires payment of `Royalty by the assessee, which is a fee payable by the assessee to ICC for each Licensed product sold as specified in Appendix 4. In turn, Appendix 4 provides that the assessee shall be liable to pay royalty at the rate of 6% on the wholesale price of Cricket bats sold using its Marks, 5% on the wholesale price of other Cricket equipments sold using its Marks and 12.5% on wholesale price of non inclusive support apparel sold using its Marks. This shows that there is a separate provision in the Agreement for payment of royalty on the manufacture and sale of licensed products using the Marks of ICC, which is obviously in the nature of `Royalty duly covered under Clause (iii) of Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(iii) o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n services. Thus, the tribunal held that the amount was neither in the nature of `Royalty as per Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vi) nor in the nature of `Fees for technical services as per Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii) but only `Business income . As the assessee did not have any PE in India, the business income was also held to be not chargeable to tax. The Hon'ble High Court approved the view taken by the Tribunal. We find that the facts of the case under consideration are on much stronger footing. In that case, the services to be rendered by Sheraton were not only publicity, advertisement but also concerning sales, for which one composite payment was made, which was held to be not in the nature of `Royalty . In the instant case, we are concerned only with payment of ₹ 4.56 crore as `Rights fee , which is exclusively for the use of Marks of ICC for the purposes of promotion and advertisement and not for manufacture and sale of licensed products. When a consolidated payment for both the advertisement and nonadvertisement services was held to be not `Royalty , we cannot hold payment only for the advertisement services, as royalty. In view of the foregoing discussion, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y `Rights fee to ICC even during the preceding year. Taking this factor into consideration, the ld. DR was directed to inform the Bench if the payment by the assessee to ICC during the instant year or in earlier years was subjected to tax in the hands of the latter. Despite allowing time, the ld. DR failed to point out if the amount in question has been subjected to tax in the assessment of ICC. Obligation to deduct tax at source u/s 195 in the hands of a payer is a natural consequence of chargeability to tax of the receipt in the hands of payee. Failure of the Revenue to bring on record any evidence of such payment having been subjected to tax in the hands of ICC also casts shadow on the liability of the assessee to deduct tax at source. 46. We, ergo, hold that the payment made by the assessee to ICC amounting to ₹ 4.56 crore as `Rights fee is not in the nature of `Royalty or `Fees for technical services covered u/s 9(1)(vi) or 9(1(vii) of the Act and as such the assessee was not obliged to deduct tax at source on this payment. Ex consequenti, the provisions of section 40(a)(i) are not attracted. This ground is not allowed. 47. In the result, the appeal of the as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
