Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (10) TMI 1139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s a mistake inasmuch as the same does not relate to the facts of the present case except that the reference of Appeal No. and impugned order-in-appeal match in the preamble to those in case under consideration making it look as if the present order relates to the appeal of M/s. Paramount Communication. As such, it has to be concluded that the entire order is a mistake, requiring rectification of same. The point made out by learned AR that such rectification can be done only to small clerical mistake in the order, cannot be appreciated inasmuch as in the present case the entire order is a clerical mistake. The mistakes required to be rectified does not depend upon the length of said mistake or does not relate to one or two words in the order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or supply of manpower, temporarily or otherwise, to a client" 3. The present appellant is a manufacturer of excisable goods and is not engaged in the business of supply of manpower, though they were 'sharing the services of some of the office personnel with their sister concern. Here there is no case of supply of manpower by the appellant to the sister company because the employees concerned continued to work for the appellant also and arrangement in which certain employees work for two of sister concerns and the expenses of employees are shared, the manpower is not supplied by one company to other. The situation is that the personnel do the work of both the companies. The service is by the personnel to the two companies in question .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ome stands denied on the ground that the said services cannot be held to be eligible cenvatable input services. 3. We find that the issue is no more res integra and stand decided by the following decisions :- CCE, Bangalore v. Bell Ceramics Ltd. [2012 (25) S.T.R. 428 (Kar.)] CCE, Bangalore-III v. Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. [2011 (23) S.T.R. 444] 4. Inasmuch as both the issues are covered by the decisions of the Hon'ble Court, respectfully following the same, we set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief to the appellants. Stay petition as also appeal gets disposed of in the above manner." (ii) The above facts do not pertain to issue involved in the appeal No. S.T./1459/2011-CU(DB) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wders Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Trade Tax, UP [2008 (221) E.L.T. 16 (S.C.) = 2008 (9) S.T.R. 113 (S.C.)]; 2. Asstt. Commr., Income Tax, Rajkot v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. [2008 (230) E.L.T. 385 (S.C.) = 2010 (18) S.T.R. 84 (S.C.)]; 3. Sunitadevi Singhania Hospital Trust v. Union of India [2009 (233) E.L.T. 295 (S.C.)]; 4. Commissioner of Sales Tax, UP v. Bharat Bone Mill [2007 (6) S.T.R. 167 (S.C.) = 2007 (210) E.L.T. 6 (S.C.)]; 5. Mustan Taherbhai v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs [2011 (265) E.L.T. 161(S.C.)]; 6. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. Oswal Petrochemicals Ltd. [2010 (256) E.L.T. 190 (S.C.)]; 7. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara v. Steelco Gujarat Ltd. [2004 (163) E.L.T. 403 (S.C.)]. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... se except that the reference of Appeal No. and impugned order-in-appeal match in the preamble to those in case under consideration making it look as if the present order relates to the appeal of M/s. Paramount Communication. As such, it has to be concluded that the entire order is a mistake, requiring rectification of same. The point made out by learned AR that such rectification can be done only to small clerical mistake in the order, cannot be appreciated inasmuch as in the present case the entire order is a clerical mistake. The mistakes required to be rectified does not depend upon the length of said mistake or does not relate to one or two words in the order. When the entire order which got issued was not relatable to the matter under .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates