2017 (5) TMI 594

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y concluded with only the final orders having to be passed by the adjudicating authorities, the Court is not inclined, at this stage, to entertain the plea of the Petitioner - none of the applicants and coapplicants has questioned the order of the CCESC declining the relief prayed for by them arising out of the same SCN - Entertaining the case of the Petitioner in such circumstances is neither fea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder, the Settlement Commission has declined the relief sought and sent the case back to the adjudicating authority for adjudication in accordance with law. 3. It must be noticed, at the outset, that the application before the CCESC was by four applicants and eight co-applicants. The Petitioner was one among those four applicants. It is not in dispute that, barring the Applicant, none of the ot .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nsel who at the last moment declined to act as such. 6. Considering the developments subsequent to the filing of the present petition where the adjudication proceedings have virtually concluded with only the final orders having to be passed by the adjudicating authorities, the Court is not inclined, at this stage, to entertain the plea of the Petitioner. One other factor that weighs with the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X