9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (6) TMI 261X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Respondent ORDER Per: Shri P. K. Choudhary Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondents were engaged in the manufacture of glassware (both opal glassware and crystal glassware) classifiable under Chapter 70 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 2. A Show Cause Notice dated 13/06/2007 was issued proposing to impose penalty under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. It has b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... invariably used to mention the unit of quantity in kg. in their ARE-1, therefore, the standard unit of quantity i.e. kg. may also be mentioned in respect of clearances for home consumption. It is submitted that the respondent had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 12 of CER when they submitted their ER-1 returns without indicating proper standard of unit of quantity as prescribed under First ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dditional Note No. (3) to Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 is reproduced below for ease of reference : "In column (3), the standard unit of quantity is specified for each tariff item to facilitate the collection, comparison and analysis of trade statistics." 3. Thus, standard units of quantity for each tariff item have ben specified to facilitate collection, comparison and analysis of trade stat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 31st March, 2005." The Ld. Sr. Advocate also drew the attention of the Bench to the following circulars: * CBEC Letter F. VAL/217/2001 dated November 9, 2005. * Commr. of Customs (Import), JNCH, Nahva Sheva, Public Notice No. 37/2013 dated- November, 2013. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the above Board's circular, I agree with the findings of the Ld. Commissi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
