1972 (9) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or it is confined to the Board itself invoking the power suo motu - - - - - Dated:- 12-9-1972 - Judge(s) : RAGHAVAN., VEERASWAMI. JUDGMENT W. P. No. 2133 of 1966. The judgment of the court was delivered by VEERASWAMI C.J- We think that this petition is covered by the decision of a Division Bench to which one of us was a party, in W.P. No. 4629 of 1965. The point is whether, under sect .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t, 1939, and still down the decades this court has very rarely invoked the power suo motu. The power has always been invoked by this court on applications by aggrieved parties. Even if section 25 has prescribed the power of revision to be exercised suo motu, the power could be invoked on an application by the aggrieved party. Once the power is found vested, it makes no difference how it is invoked .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X