9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 290X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... there, it cannot be called as an illegal at present and further when the petitioner had undertaken to make payment of the said amount in the present petition, which was to the effect that he will deposit the amount by the end of December, 2005 and January, 2006, this Court is not expected to stay only the attachment order. The petitioner has virtually misused the process of law and the recovery w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... said proceedings, no action could have been taken. In the body of the present petition, it is expressed that the petitioner was ready to deposit the amount of ₹ 17,58,950/in installments. 3. This Court on 03.08.2007 granted interim relief in terms of prayer clauses 'D' and 'E'. Thus, the petitioner got a blanket protection. The respondents could not take further action due ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed and attachment order was challenged in this Court. When the demand order is still there, it cannot be called as an illegal at present and further when the petitioner had undertaken to make payment of the said amount in the present petition, which was to the effect that he will deposit the amount by the end of December, 2005 and January, 2006, this Court is not expected to stay only the attachme ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
