2017 (7) TMI 564

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ivas ORDER ( Judgment of the Court was delivered by Rajiv Shakdher, J. ) 1. This is an appeal directed against the order dated 17.03.2014, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short, 'the Tribunal'). 2. By this order, the Tribunal directed the Appellant/Assessee to deposit a sum of Rs. 8.00 crores, towards duty, interest and penalty, as a condition of st .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... his Court dated 18.06.2014. 4.1. Furthermore, Mr.Srinivas, fairly states that the present case relates to a period, prior to the amendment made in Section 35 (F)(iii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short, 'the 1944 Act'), which requires an appellant to make pre-deposit equivalent to 7.5% of the duty demanded or penalty imposed or both via the impugned demand. 5. We are informed by M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X