Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (7) TMI 718

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nal) and prayed to quash and set aside the order on the following questions of law: (1) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the appellant is liable to pay interest when there is no provision in law for charging interest? (2) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the appellant has not agitated this issue and hence, the same cannot be gone into? 2 Heard finally by consent of the parties, therefore, this final judgment. 3 The relevant facts are as under: The Appellant is inter alia, engaged in the manufacture of Embroidered Grey Fabrics falling under Chapter Sub Heading No. 5804.11 of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... charge of interest provided under Section 11AB of Excise Act. The above provision, therefore, we have to keep in mind while deciding the issues so raised in the present Appeal. 5 On 02.05.2003, the appellant replied to the show cause notice and denied the allegations. On 31.03.2004, the Joint Commissioner, Central Excise, Vapi vide its order confirmed the entire demand of ADE (T&TA) of Rs. 6,23,478/along with interest under Section 11AB and imposed equal penalty amounting to Rs. 6,23,478/under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, apart from penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/under erstwhile Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1994 (The Rules). 6 Being aggrieved, the appellant filed appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal vide .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in the earlier order passed by the Appellate Tribunal. 9 In the year 2010, 2011 and 2012, the adjudicating authority dropped the penalty under Section 11AC ibid vide order dated 29.03.2010 on the ground that there was no provision for confiscation or imposition of penalty under Section 11AC ibid for failure to pay AED (T & TA) which was levied under the provisions of the ADE (T&TA) Act. Consequently, the appellant filed an application seeking refund of predeposit of Rs. 3,12,000/made in compliance of order dated 07.11.2008 passed by the Appellate Tribunal. 10 On 26.12.2012, however, its order the adjudicating authority sanctioned the refund of Rs. 3,12,000/but appropriated the same against interest amounting to Rs. 8,45,446/alleged to be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he adjudicating authorities have, at every stage, confirmed the demand including of penalties and recovery of interest and, therefore, the issues have attained finality; the Appellant ought to have, at the relevant time, filed an Application for rectification of mistake; the same was not done and, therefore, such concurrent findings so given by the authorities need not be disturbed and/or interfered with in the present Appeal. We are not inclined to accept these contentions, even the reasoning given by the learned authorities while confirming the said demand of interest specifically in view of above provision of law and fact. There is no provision to collect such taxes and specifically when there is nothing pointed out nor any reason given .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ter for want of law and authority, is unsustainable and is required to be interfered with. The taxing provisions must be cleared and so also the charging Section and the mechanism to collect it. It needs to be construed strictly. [Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)I, New Delhi Vs. Vatika Township Private Limited (2015) 1 SCC 1 (5 Judges Bench).] 16 We have noted that the Appellate Tribunal while passing the order though dealt with Section 11AC of Excise Act, referring to Supreme Court judgment in State of M. P. vs. BHEL (supra), set aside the demand of penalty by allowing the Appeal of the Appellant. 17 The Department itself, therefore, accepted the position of law and even set aside such imposition under Section 11AC by Additional Comm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates