2017 (8) TMI 570

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ch by the Revenue. Regarding the income from the third of those properties, although a remand was ordered by the ITAT to the AO for redetermination, the Assessee has chosen not to go in appeal since the amount involved was insignificant. The plea of the Revenue that, even in respect of the other two properties, the order should be remanded to the AO does not find favour with the Court. Unless a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in filing is condoned and the applications are disposed of. ITA No. 503/2017 ITA No. 504/2017 3. The Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order dated 25th October, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) for the Assessment Year ( AY ) 2007-08 in ITA No.733 and 788/Del/2013. 4. The question that arose before .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nable, the ITAT has, in the impugned order, taken note of the fact that income from at least two of the three properties in question had been consistently treated as income from house property and accepted as such by the Revenue. Regarding the income from the third of those properties, although a remand was ordered by the ITAT to the AO for redetermination, the Assessee has chosen not to go in app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X