9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 226X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ive of the N/N. 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004 issued by the Government of India exercising powers conferred by sub Section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act? Held that: - the notification aforesaid has not been taken into consideration by the authorities referred above. It is also relevant to mention that under the N/N. 14/2004, the Government of India further exempted taxable services provided t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tted to examine a substantial question of law in the terms that Whether the Custom, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in confirming levy of Service Tax, interest and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 against the appellant by covering the activities under the category of business/service irrespective of the Notification No. 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004 issued by the Government o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by learned counsel for the appellant is that the Adjudicating Authority, the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal failed to appreciate that the Government of India while exercising powers conferred by Sub-Section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994, exempted a portion of the value of taxable services including the service provided to a customer by anybody corporate or commercial concern ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds including procurement of goods or service which are inputs for the clients. This notification too has not been taken into consideration by the Adjudicating Authority and both the Appellate Authorities. 5. Looking to this factual background, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this appeal by setting aside the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the first Appellate Authority and the C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
