9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (8) TMI 551X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposing of the five writ appeals. By the impugned order the High Court has in effect set aside the order passed by the Registrar under S.62 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 adding the present respondents as parties to the claim cases of the appellant. The appellant carries on the banking business. Claiming that Resp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Registrar was challenged under Art.226 of the Constitution before the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition. The respondents preferred five separate appeals, which, as we have already noted, were disposed of by the impugned judgment. ( 4. ) The only ground on which the High Court has allowed the appeals is that the claims of the appellant against the respond ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ailable. ( 5. ) The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that the Division Bench was justified in concluding that the respondents should not have been added as parities because the appellant's claim against them was on the basis of the pleading barred by limitation. It is submitted that on the basis of the pleadings available before the appellate court, it is clear th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e open to the added respondents to raise the contention in the proceedings before the Registrar that the claim of the appellant against the respondents is barred by limitation. We emphasise that the order of the Registrar adding the respondents as parties to the proceedings will not be reopened. We also make it clear that we have not decided any issue on the merits of the cases. ( 7. ) There sh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
