9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 836X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , was till the formation of the Trust which was as of 01.04.1998. It is not that at no point in time, recognition either under the provisions of the Act, 1952 or Income Tax Act, 1961 was accorded to the petitioner. At this point in time, it be also observed that the Mandi Kullu Road Transport Corporation and the Himachal Government Transport were amalgamated with the formation of a new body known ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... And Ajay Mohan Goel, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr.Goverdhan Sharma For the Respondents : Ms.Sukarma Sharma, Advocate,vice counsel Ms.Vandana Kuthiala ORDER Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice Petitioner is essentially aggrieved of the fact that while passing order dated 25.06.2008 (Annexure P- 9), appropriate Authority i.e. Central Board of Direct Taxes, did not consider and p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t of the Department of Income Tax, reads as under:- TELEGRAM CUM FAX No. CPF/S/SS-69/SIC Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax Patiala-II Dated Patalia the 19-10-1973 To The General Manager, Mandi Kullu Road Transport Corporation, Mandi. Subject:- Recognition of Contributory Provident Fund- Mandi Kullu Road Transport Corporation, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at no point in time, recognition either under the provisions of the Act, 1952 or Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1961) was accorded to the petitioner. At this point in time, it be also observed that the Mandi Kullu Road Transport Corporation and the Himachal Government Transport were amalgamated with the formation of a new body known as Himachal Road Transport Corporatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
